For many artists, writers, designers, and musicians, the rise of artificial intelligence has arrived with a knot in the stomach. Tools can now generate images, music, essays, and videos in seconds. What once demanded years of practice or long hours of focused labor now appears to happen instantly. Across media platforms, the same question keeps surfacing. Is this the end of creativity?
The fear is understandable. Creativity is deeply tied to identity, expression, and meaning. When machines appear to encroach on that space, the instinct is to defend what feels uniquely human. But history suggests that moments like this are not endings. They are shifts. This is not the death of creativity. It is a shift in where power lives. And for those with vision, discipline, and depth, this may be the most powerful moment to create in modern history.
Technology Has Always Rewritten Art, Not Destroyed It
Every major technological shift has been framed as a threat to artists. When photography emerged in the 19th century, painters feared obsolescence. When recorded music emerged, musicians worried that performance would lose its value. When digital tools entered filmmaking, critics argued that craft would be lost to software, sacrificed to convenience. Yet art did not disappear. It adapted.
Photography did not kill painting. It helped push artists toward impressionism, abstraction, and new ways of seeing. Recorded music did not end live performance. It expanded audiences and reshaped how music travelled across borders. Digital tools did not end cinema. They reshaped how stories were told and who could tell them.
Experts have argued for years that new tools do not eliminate creativity but expand the creative field. When technology lowers barriers, it increases participation, experimentation, and diversity of voices. The work that survives is not the easiest to make, but the hardest to replace. Media theorist Marshall McLuhan (1964) famously argued that new technologies do not replace old forms. They reorganize human perception and cultural priorities. Each shift changes what is scarce and what is abundant. What becomes abundant loses value. What becomes scarce becomes precious.
This pattern explains why AI feels threatening while also being full of possibilities. It does not erase creativity. It relocates where value is created. Research on technological change and cultural production shows that creative fields tend to fragment and diversify when tools become cheaper and more accessible. But it is a known fact that artistic value is not determined solely by production, but by interpretation, context, and cultural framing. Tools can multiply works, but they cannot automatically generate significance. AI fits neatly into this historical arc. It does not erase creativity. It forces it to evolve.
When Output Is Easy, Meaning Becomes the Work
One of the most profound changes AI introduces is how quickly ideas can be executed. What once took days now takes minutes. What once required teams can now be done solo. This compression between idea and output is unprecedented. But speed does not guarantee depth. The world is flooded with outputs, but still starving for insight, truth, and original voice. This is why the barrier to execution has lowered, but the barrier to meaning has risen.
The ability to choose what matters, what resonates, and what should exist at all becomes more important than the ability to simply produce. Psychological research on creativity supports this shift. Studies in cognitive science emphasize that creativity is not just about generation, but about selection and refinement. Teresa Amabile (1996), a leading creativity researcher at Harvard Business School, long argued that creative excellence depends on domain knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and evaluative skill. AI can assist with generation, but it cannot replace human evaluation grounded in lived experience.
In this sense, AI acts as both a constraint and an accelerator. It compresses the distance between idea and manifestation. What once took months can happen in minutes. But that speed exposes shallow thinking quickly. Weak ideas do not improve simply because they are produced faster. If anyone can generate an image, the question becomes why this image should exist. If anyone can write an essay, the question becomes what insight it offers. Meaning is no longer accidental. It must be intentional. AI is simply a new constraint and a new accelerator. It removes friction but demands judgment.
From Generators to Curators, Editors, and Thinkers
We are entering an era where creativity is less about producing more and more about choosing better. The internet is already flooded with content. AI intensifies this flood. Millions of images, articles, videos, and sounds compete for attention every day. Yet audiences remain hungry for insight, coherence, and truth. They are not overwhelmed by ideas. They are overwhelmed by noise. This is why the advantage now belongs to curators over generators, editors over imitators, thinkers over prompt recyclers.
Curation is not passive. It is an act of taste, responsibility, and vision. Editors shape meaning by deciding what to include, what to exclude, and how ideas relate to each other. Thinkers add value by framing questions, not just producing answers. Journalistic analysis of algorithmic culture points to this shift clearly. Platforms like Spotify, Netflix, and YouTube increasingly rely on human and hybrid curation to stand out, even as recommendation algorithms grow more powerful. Audiences still respond to trusted voices and intentional storytelling.
The same applies to art and creative work. The artist’s role is expanding, not shrinking. Artists are no longer limited by time, access, geography, or traditional gatekeepers. A writer in Lagos, a designer in Nairobi, or a filmmaker in Bangalore can reach global audiences without institutional permission. What cannot be automated is clarity of thought, depth of feeling, and intentional decision-making. The artists who thrive now are those who think clearly about what they want to say, see deeply into culture and human behavior, feel honestly rather than perform trends, and decide intentionally instead of reacting to tools.
AI can assist the creative process. It can help explore variations, test ideas, and reduce friction. But it cannot decide why a story matters, why a moment is worth capturing, or why a voice should be heard now.
Becoming More Human in the Age of Machines
The real task of this era is not to compete with machines. Machines will always be faster, cheaper, and more scalable at certain tasks. Competing on those terms leads to imitation and exhaustion. The task is to become more human.
Human creativity is rooted in lived experience, contradiction, emotion, memory, culture, and moral judgment. It draws meaning from context and consequence. AI systems generate patterns based on past data. Humans create by responding to the present and imagining futures that do not yet exist. Social commentators have pointed out that AI struggles with genuine originality because it has no stake in the world. It does not care. Humans do. That difference matters. They argue that while AI can assist creative work, it cannot understand human values, moral context, or emotional consequences. That responsibility remains human.
This is why the flood of AI-generated content has not eliminated the hunger for authentic voices. Readers still seek essays that reflect lived experiences. Viewers still connect with stories that feel grounded in reality. Listeners still respond to music that carries emotional truth. The audience is not looking for perfection. They are looking for truth, vulnerability, and perspective. This is a pointer to the fact that creativity is being rewritten, not erased. The rules are changing, but the core remains. Meaning still comes from human intention.
A New Creative Responsibility
With greater power comes greater responsibility. When tools remove barriers, creators must supply direction. When distribution is global, choices carry a wider impact. When output is easy, discernment becomes ethical. This moment calls for a more mature form of creativity. One that is less obsessed with volume and more concerned with value. Less reactive, more reflective. Less performative, more grounded.
Academic discussions around responsible AI and cultural production increasingly stress this point. Scholars argue that creative workers play a crucial role in shaping how technology is used, normalized, and understood. Artists are not just users of tools. They are interpreters of their consequences.
The future of creativity will not be decided by algorithms alone. It will be shaped by those who choose to engage deeply rather than superficially, intentionally rather than impulsively. The task before us is not insurmountable. We will always find ways to climb new mountains. The question is not whether artists will survive this shift. It is whether they will step fully into the expanded role this moment demands.
References
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill. URL: https://designopendata.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/understanding-media-mcluhan.pdf
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234
McGuire, J., De Cremer, D. & Van de Cruys T (2024). Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69423-2
Hale, C. (2025). Nearly all creators admit they use AI tools for work – so is this the end of true creativity? URL: https://www.techradar.com/pro/nearly-all-creators-admit-they-use-ai-tools-for-work-so-is-this-the-end-of-true-creativity?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Authored by:
Adetimilehin inioluwa Victor– Serial Creative: Poet | Essayist | Strategist | Founder:, Vic’Adex Concepts at vicadex.com
Adetimilehin Inioluwa Victor (Vic’Adex) is a serial creative and polymath who blends spoken-word poetry, painting, and communication to drive cultural innovations that advance human capital. Recognised among the top 10 contemporary spoken-word poets in Nigeria in 2015, he has since expanded his artistry into building creative safe spaces, thought leadership, and strategic communications. As an Engagement Manager at SCIDaR, he is shaping communication as a critical tool for improving social outcomes across the continent. Among his initiatives – each framed as “a Vic’Adex Concept”- are 60 Seconds Poet, Sip and Paint Abuja, and Vic’Adex Concepts & Aesthetic Resources. He continues to volunteer and contribute to social causes aligned with his creative and professional passions.
Tomilola Boyinde – Founder/CMO/Host, Bulbling247
Tomilola Boyinde is a serial creative, global marketing technologist and founder of Bulbling247, a global storytelling platform exploring creativity, technology, and innovation. He has contributed to the marketing and growth of both Nigerian and global brands, blending strategy, creative storytelling, and technology to craft campaigns that resonate and inspire. With a passion for human-centered innovation, Tomilola champions untold stories, amplifies emerging voices, and drives creative solutions that connect culture, technology, and business globally.
The AI & Creativity series was birthed by the conversation on Bulbling247 podcast. Watch the episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kXatW9RMM8&t=1391s
——————-
Bookmark Techparley.com for the most insightful technology news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @Techparleynews, on Facebook at Techparley Africa, on LinkedIn at Techparley Africa, or on Instagram at Techparleynews.
