Who Owns Africa’s Data? Power, Platforms, and the Future of Digital Sovereignty

Africa is generating data at an unprecedented scale. From mobile money transactions and biometric identity systems to AI-powered credit scoring and health diagnostics, digital data has become the backbone of the continent’s economic, political, and social transformation. Yet as data volumes expand, a fundamental question remains unresolved: who truly owns and controls Africa’s data?

The answer to this question is no longer theoretical. It shapes who profits from Africa’s digital economy, who sets the rules governing personal information, and who bears responsibility when systems fail. While African governments and startups are often portrayed as the primary actors in the digital transformation narrative, the reality is more complex. Control over data infrastructure, storage, analytics, and monetisation frequently lies beyond national borders, embedded in global platforms, cloud providers, and AI systems governed by foreign jurisdictions.

This imbalance has profound implications. Data is not merely an economic asset; it is a source of political power, regulatory leverage, and social influence. Countries that lack effective control over their data risk becoming passive participants in a global digital economy shaped elsewhere. For Africa, this raises urgent concerns about digital sovereignty, citizen rights, and long-term development.

This report examines how data ownership and control operate in practice across Africa, interrogates the role of global technology platforms, and explores whether current regulatory efforts meaningfully advance sovereignty, or merely create the appearance of it.

Understanding Data Sovereignty in the African Context

Data sovereignty is often reduced to a narrow debate about data localisation, whether data should be stored within national borders. In reality, sovereignty is far broader. It concerns who can access data, under what conditions, and for what purposes, regardless of where the servers are physically located.

In the African context, data sovereignty sits at the intersection of three realities:

1. Fragmented legal frameworks
   While more than half of African countries have enacted data protection laws, these frameworks vary widely in scope, enforcement capacity, and political backing.
2. Dependence on foreign digital infrastructure
   Most African governments and companies rely on global cloud providers for storage and processing, limiting practical control even where laws exist.
3. Regional integration pressures
   The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) promotes cross-border digital trade, often clashing with national data protection ambitions.

As a result, African data sovereignty is frequently aspirational rather than operational. Laws may exist on paper, but institutional weakness, skills shortages, and geopolitical asymmetries undermine their effectiveness.

Who Currently Controls Africa’s Data?

Global Platforms and Infrastructure Providers

Despite local innovation, much of Africa’s data ecosystem is mediated by a small number of global actors. Social media platforms, cloud service providers, mobile operating systems, and AI vendors sit at critical chokepoints in data flows.

These actors control not only storage, but also analytics, behavioural profiling, and monetisation. Their influence extends beyond technical infrastructure into norms, standards, and governance practices.

Table 1: Major Controllers of Africa’s Digital Data

While these actors enable scale and efficiency, they also concentrate power. African users generate data, but value extraction often occurs elsewhere.

Digital Public Infrastructure and State-Controlled Data

African governments are increasingly deploying digital public infrastructure to improve service delivery and governance. National identity systems, health databases, and education platforms are now central repositories of sensitive personal data.

Case studies across Nigeria, Kenya, and Ghana illustrate a common pattern: while the state claims ownership, technical control is often outsourced.

• Nigeria’s National Identification Number (NIN) system relies on private contractors and foreign infrastructure partners.
• Kenya’s Huduma Namba has faced legal challenges over privacy safeguards and governance transparency.
• Ghana’s Ghana Card system has improved service integration but raised concerns about access controls and data-sharing agreements.

These systems highlight a paradox: governments seek sovereignty through digitisation, yet often deepen dependency through procurement and infrastructure choices.

Data Colonialism or Digital Interdependence?

The concept of data colonialism argues that Africa’s data is extracted, processed, and monetised in ways that mirror historical resource exploitation. While controversial, the framework highlights real asymmetries in value creation.

Table 2: Africa’s Data Flow vs Value Retention

African users and institutions generate vast datasets, yet lack ownership of the analytical tools that convert data into economic and strategic value. AI systems trained on African behavioural, financial, and biometric data often benefit companies headquartered elsewhere.

Regulation, Power, and Enforcement Gaps

African policymakers have responded with legislation, but enforcement remains uneven. Strong laws do not automatically translate into sovereignty.

Table 3: Data Protection Enforcement Readiness

Challenges include:

• Underfunded regulators
• Political interference
• Limited technical expertise
• Cross-border jurisdictional constraints

As a result, compliance is often superficial, and accountability after breaches remains rare.

What Data Sovereignty Could Look Like in Practice

True data sovereignty does not mean isolation. It means agency.

Practical pathways include:

• Investment in regional cloud infrastructure
• Development of African AI models and datasets
• Public-interest data trusts
• Stronger cross-border regulatory cooperation

Sovereignty is less about where data sits, and more about who decides.

Strategic Implications for Africa’s Digital Future

Failure to address data ownership risks locking Africa into a subordinate position in the global digital economy. Conversely, strategic governance could enhance innovation, trust, and bargaining power.

Key implications include:

• Greater resilience against cyber and political risk
• Improved citizen trust in digital systems
• Stronger negotiating power with global platforms

Policy Recommendations

1. Strengthen enforcement institutions, not just laws
2. Mandate transparency in cross-border data transfers
3. Support African digital infrastructure investment
4. Align AfCFTA with data governance objectives
5. Fund local AI research and capacity building

The Way Forward

Africa’s digital future depends on who controls and governs the data generated across the continent. Without deliberate action, Africa risks remaining a passive data producer, with global platforms and foreign infrastructure capturing most of the value.

Achieving data sovereignty is not about isolation but about building institutional capacity, regulatory strength, and local digital infrastructure that ensure citizens and governments can meaningfully control and benefit from their data.

Moving forward, the continent must invest in African-owned cloud systems, AI research, and public-interest data frameworks, while strengthening regional coordination and enforcement of existing laws. By prioritising transparency, accountability, and equitable value creation, Africa can transform data from a source of external extraction into a tool for innovation, governance, and long-term resilience, shaping a digital ecosystem that works for its people.

——————-

Bookmark Techparley.com for the most insightful technology news from the African continent.

Follow us on Twitter @Techparleynews, on Facebook at Techparley Africa, on LinkedIn at Techparley Africa, or on Instagram at Techparleynews.